Prioritize barriers around essential tasks.
We review representative templates and the actions that matter most: navigation, service information, search, forms, booking, purchasing, account access, downloads, and contact. Automated tools help identify patterns, while manual checks reveal problems scanners cannot understand.
Findings are prioritized by severity, frequency, reach, and business importance. The goal is not to celebrate a numerical score while a keyboard user remains trapped three controls away from the inquiry form.
Repair structure, controls, content, and presentation.
Work may include semantic headings, landmarks, link purpose, form labels, instructions, error messages, focus order, visible focus, keyboard behavior, dialog controls, color contrast, text resizing, image alternatives, captions, and reduced-motion behavior.
We prefer fixes in shared templates and components so improvements reach multiple pages consistently. Where a third-party widget creates the barrier, we document the limitation and evaluate an accessible alternative.
Retest the workflow and support future content.
After remediation, we repeat the relevant automated and manual checks and verify that forms, analytics, design, and other functionality still work. Accessibility improvements should not be introduced as a new source of regression.
We can document recurring authoring practices for headings, links, images, documents, and new components. Accessibility is an ongoing quality discipline, and remediation creates a better foundation rather than a permanent certificate of perfection.
Accessibility remediation can include
- Representative-page automated and manual review
- Keyboard, focus, navigation, form, and dialog corrections
- Headings, landmarks, labels, alternatives, and link improvements
- Contrast, resizing, motion, media, and responsive adjustments
- Regression testing and content-authoring recommendations